Last September, British soldiers, wearing Arab garb and head dress, were caught preparing for a terror attack in the Iraqi city of Basra. The British SAS drove their car towards a group of Iraq police and started opening fire at them.
The fact that the occupation soldiers, later arrested and taken to a jail where they were confronted and interrogated by an Iraqi judge, the fact that they were dressed in Arab garb proves that the operation was staged so that eyewitnesses would believe Iraqis were behind the terror attack.
But a few days ago, news reports uncovered anotehr evidence on how the current Iraqi quagmire is designed to degenerate into a chaotic abyss. Earlier this week, it was reported that Iraqi police arrested an American private security contractor working at a U.S. military base in the northern Iraqi town of Tikrit Iraq, after they found explosives in his car.
The U.S. military confirmed the report.
The man, who was stopped by police for violating a daytime curfew in the toppled Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein’s hometown, Tikrit, denied that he had explosives in his car, but said he had two AK-47 assault rifles.
“He was picked up by Iraqi police after being detained at a checkpoint in Tikrit,” the spokesman said, adding that the police later released him. “We are looking at why he left the base unescorted.”
It’s noteworthy that American security personnel rarely travel alone.
At the same time another report emerged that the Iraqi Shia leader Muqtada Al Sadr accused the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency of orchestrating recent attacks in Iraq with the aim of instigating ethnic tension which would bring the country into a bloody civil war.
“The American forces had provided an air cover, with several drones circling the Sadr city, and then cutting off all wireless communication throughout Sadr city, just before the setting off of the six car explosions that resulted in the death of around 60 people and the injury of 200 others in Sadr city on Sunday.”
At the time of Basra scandal, Iran’s top military commander Brigadier General Mohammad-Baqer Zolqadr was quoted as accusing the occupation forces of staging terror attacks in Iraq.
“The Americans blame weak and feeble groups in Iraq for insecurity in this country. We do not believe this and we have information that the insecurity has its roots in the activities of American and Israeli spies,” he said.
“Insecurity in Iraq is a deeply-rooted phenomenon. The root of insecurity in Iraq lies in the occupation of this country by foreigners”.
“If Iraq is to become secure, there will be no room for the occupiers”.
Linking the two incidents in Iraq, the occupation forces’ tricks seem evident. As many analysts had pointed out, there’s a great possibility that the bloody attacks that take place in Iraq almost on a daily basis are the work of agents’ provocateurs working for the U.S.-led occupation.
Maybe you would like to modify your question with actual news items from which you cite your quotes. I, for one, put no evil past the US and British corrupt governments, they have proven themselves to be liars, traitors, and thieves. But many Americans still refuse to believe their own eyes and ears. I hope they wake up soon, before we have no liberty left. And Richbro, anyone who would quote the likes of Ann Coulter (another treasonous pig) to support an indefensible and irrational opinion probably deserves to share with her the fate she would wish upon others.
Please provide creditable references to this fairy tale.
You’re in fantasy-land
As Ann Coulter says,
“We should invade their countries,{Muslim}, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity!
I like that fantasy-land better!
billyboy64.it is not a fairy tale.it is truth.they were shown in the tv in tens of sat stations using a land rover,disguising in a very stupid way as arabs(as they are shown in hollywood films)AND THEIR CAR WAS FULL OF GUNS AND EXPLOSIVES.as a reaction,the british tanks destroyed the police station in order to free them ,and even crushed the parked cars there.you cant hide the sun.there are hundreds of other evidances,but who balives!!!.
“occupation soldiers”
“toppled Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein”
“Iraqi Shia leader Muqtada Al Sadr”
“agents’ provocateurs working for the U.S.-led occupation”
We each form our own opinions based on information that is made available to us. While I would never claim that the U.S. media gives the whole story, its obvious from your wording that you may also have been over-exposed to biased reporting.
Other than that? Pure conspiracy theories with no factual support.
Well, when I was in Iraq, we had reports from Iraqi civilian contractors saying that some groups of Iraqi civilians were doing these attacks to keep the U.S. and U.N. forces in Iraq. Not only did that keep the militants from taking over, it also brought in much needed money for the merchants that were oppressed by Saddam and the Bathe party. Makes sense to me.